The network giant is trying to deceive the Permian builders


Construction company Perm is suing the retailer
Photo:


Perm-based construction company OOO TeploTrans is suing Magnit JSC Tander, a trading network management company. In 2017, Tander concluded several contracts for the renovation of non-residential premises in order to open Magnit or Magnit Cosmetic stores. The contractor made repairs, the stores opened in 2017, but the network giant was in no hurry to pay for the work. Ilya Demin, managing partner of B2B Law – Business Advocates, told URA.RU about this.

“The company has no signed acts on the work performed. In addition, the management of Tander JSC’s Perm branch insisted that the parties sign additional agreements in which the contractor agreed to deduct a significant amount of the penalty from the payment under the pretext that otherwise the contractor would not receive payment for shop repairs. , “Said the defender of URA.RU.

But even after signing the contracts, TeploTrans LLC did not receive the money. He then turned to lawyers to recover the debt through the courts. Eight lawsuits were filed. JSC “Tander” filed counterclaims in which it demanded a penalty from the contractor for the alleged delay in work. At the same time, the trader claimed in court that the work had not yet been completed, despite the fact that the shops had been operating for a long time.

“In most cases, we managed to resolve the case in our favor without a review – the courts simply took into account the unilateral actions of the contractor. This is rare in case law, “Fyodor Leppa, a lawyer and head of dispute resolution at B2B Law – Business Lawyers, told URA.RU.

One case ended in a compromise agreement, in six cases the courts met the requirements of the Perm contractor, and the other case is now pending before the court. The total amount of all disputes is about 10 million rubles.

URA.RU correspondent sent a request to Tander JSC with a request to state its position in this dispute. He did not receive a response at the time of publication.

Earlier, URA.RU told how a businessman who owns a company in Germany and Turkey tried to deceive a wood supplier from Perm. He filed lawsuits to recover the non-existent debt and provided false evidence.

If you want to report the news, write to us

Continue to receive URA.RU news, even if it is blocked by Google, subscribe to Perm telegram channel “Big P”.

Perm-based construction company OOO TeploTrans is suing Magnit JSC Tander, a trading network management company. In 2017, Tander concluded several contracts for the renovation of non-residential premises in order to open Magnit or Magnit Cosmetic stores. The contractor made repairs, the stores opened in 2017, but the network giant was in no hurry to pay for the work. Ilya Demin, managing partner of B2B Law – Business Advocates, told URA.RU about this. “The company has no signed acts on the work performed. In addition, the management of Tander JSC’s Perm branch insisted that the parties sign additional agreements in which the contractor agreed to deduct a significant amount of the penalty from the payment under the pretext that otherwise the contractor would not receive payment for shop repairs. , “Said the defender of URA.RU. But even after signing the contracts, TeploTrans LLC did not receive the money. He then turned to lawyers to recover the debt through the courts. Eight lawsuits were filed. JSC “Tander” filed counterclaims in which it demanded a penalty from the contractor for the alleged delay in work. At the same time, the trader claimed in court that the work had not yet been completed, despite the fact that the shops had been operating for a long time. “In most cases, we managed to resolve the case in our favor without a review – the courts simply took into account the unilateral actions of the contractor. This is rare in case law, “Fyodor Leppa, a lawyer and head of dispute resolution at B2B Law – Business Lawyers, told URA.RU. One case ended in a compromise agreement, in six cases the courts met the requirements of the Perm contractor, and the other case is now pending before the court. The total amount of all disputes is about 10 million rubles. URA.RU correspondent sent a request to Tander JSC with a request to state its position in this dispute. He did not receive a response at the time of publication. Earlier, URA.RU told how a businessman who owns a company in Germany and Turkey tried to deceive a wood supplier from Perm. He filed lawsuits to recover the non-existent debt and provided false evidence.

Elvira Parkinson

"Alcohol scholar. Hardcore tv junkie. Wannabe bacon enthusiast. Twitter fanatic. Subtly charming travel guru. Pop culture specialist."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.